**CppQuant Answer**

According to the put-call parity, c(0) + X/(1 + r)^T = p(0) + S(0)

- the fiduciary call (lhs) = 7.5 + 100/(1.10)^0.5 = 102.85.
- the protective put (rhs) = 4.25 + 99 = 103.25
- Since protective put > fiduciary call, that means the protective put is overpriced.
- We could sell the protective put: sell the put and sell short the underlying. Doing so will generate a cash inflow of $103.25. The we buy fiduciary call, paying out $102,85, netting a cash inflow of $0.4.
- At expiration, if the price of the underlying is above 100:
- the bond matures, paying $100. use the $100 to exercise call, receiving the underlying.
- deliver the underlying to cover the short sale.
- the put expires with no value.
- net effect: no money in or out.

- Similarily If the price of the underlying is below 100 at expiration.

- At expiration, if the price of the underlying is above 100:

- So we receive $0.4 up front and do not have to pay anything out.

*Bonus Points*

- Put-call parity: c(0) + X/(1 + r)^T = p(0) + S(0) : the lhs is known as fiduciary call, rhs protective put
- If the underlying assets make cash payments: c0 + X/(1 + r)T = P0 + [S0 - PV(CF, 0, T)] where PV(CF, 0, T) represents the present value of these cash flows.
- The position is perfectly hedged and represents an arbitrage profit.

*Category: C++ Quant > Derivatives > Options*

**Elsewhere on BlogSpot**

Angry Bear

KUDLOW S MONEY POLITIC$ - Of course he forgot to mention that that was, essentially, a risk-free rate of return. Turn the clock ahead to 2002, by which time 2 looked pretty good, ...

Slacktivist

SHRILLBLOG - Secured credit lending is 100-percent risk free for the institution making the loan. How then is the high-risk rate justified? It isn t. It can t be...

Mark Byron

MINI-MICROSOFT - ... biggies You add the three factors to come up with an interest rate for a loan. If you have a risk-free short-term government loan, if you had a 2 real ...

12/01/2004 12/31/2004

NO QUARTERS - In 1851, Congress again lowered rates and simultaneously enacted a law to protect the ... Safe and risk free he says. I have trouble believing that...

TigerHawk

FINANCEPROFESSOR.COM - The risk that Iraq had WMD was but one of several good reasons to invade Iraq... Were new standards in force, at our rate of use we could spend $228 more ...

## No comments:

## Post a Comment